Intro) Listen to Muriel Gray lie


Legal Section Scales of Justice Contacts Blog



Main Menu

Intro) Listen to Muriel Gray lie
1) Muriel Gray's High Court claim 17 Dec 09 against Geoff Widders
2) Proof of the date of Geoff Widders novel
3) Muriel Gray lied to the audience
4) Costs and Gillian Cross


5) The Ancient 2000 IS A FABRICATION


6) Deception Exposed


7) "A tomorrow's chip wrapper affair "


8) Muriel Gray "one of the most insulting things"


9) "best investigative journalism in the field today "


10) Support for a lie?


11) GW Book


12) Muriel Gray's "homage"(s)


13) FantasyCon 2012




14a) Complaint to Glasgow School of Art


14b) Reply to my Complaint from the Glasgow School of Art


14c) Complaint to Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO)re: Glasgow School of Art decision






Intro) Summary of LEGAL SECTION
A) Letter to Lord Woolf


B) "Suffer any wrong that can be done you rather than come here"


C) Appendix 2 : Declaratory Judgment


D) Appendix 3 : Law Commission


E) Mr Justice Roth's reply. GW comments


Fi) Three Complaints to Ms Judy Anckorn, "Office for Judicial Complaints" (OJC)


Fii) Three Complaints to Sir John Brigstocke, "Judicial Ombudsman"


Fiii) Correspondence with Ms Anckorn (OJC), and Sir John Brigstocke


G) Complaint to the "Solicitor's Regulation Authority "


H) Nichola Evans of Browne Jacobson fabricated costs


I) Chancery Division


J) Report of the Lord Neuberger Committee


K) Letter of Intent



Intro) Scales of Justice


i) Pursuit of Justice OR Pursuit of Money and Power?


ii) Report of the Lady Neuberger Committee


iii) The Infallibility of Judges


Muriel Gray

Geoff Widders


Search this site only

[will not run IE 8]

Search hewasanutter.com



RSS Feeds / Share

[Valid RSS]

Subscribe in a reader

Share |


Read / Sample / Purchase Flight of the Shaman

Read 'Flight of the Shaman' online

Download from this site

Flight of the Shaman [pdf]




"So obviously he was a nutter."


Muriel Gray


Intro) Listen to Muriel Gray lie

Muriel Gray; Chair of the Orange Awards, writer, broadcaster, companies director, etc. told an audience that "this guy" had complained to HarperCollins that she had "stolen my story."

Muriel Gray told the audience that the guy's book was "practically the double" of hers, but that he had written his book "long after" hers. She told the audience, "So obviously he was a nutter."

Muriel Gray worked the audience up to a "big laugh."

Muriel Gray had in fact lied to the audience about the date of the guy's work.

I am the "guy."




I issued a claim against Muriel Gray in the Small Claims court [view it here]. It was a simple claim, I simply wished to prove, in a court of law, that my book was not written "long after" hers. In fact it was written long before hers. Instead of answering that simple claim Muriel Gray employed a team of top flight lawyers to prevent the claim being heard. She had to take the matter to the High Court before her team succeeded.

I had asked that the courts rule upon which book was written first. Instead of allowing my Small Claim to progress Mr Justice Roth, sitting in the Chancery Division of the High Court, stated his concerns for "famous people." What are the courts for if not to rule upon the truth?

My website now puts the matter to the public. Instead of the courts carrying out their function and determining the truth of this matter it is now for the public.

I hope you will wish to enquire further and that my website hewasanutter.com will provide you with answers.


Geoff Widders



































My undertaking

If there is anything that I have stated on this site that is not correct; if Muriel Gray, Harper Collins, Browne Jacobson, or any person(s) mentioned in these pages, contacts me and provides the evidence or counter argument to show that I am not correct, or...

if there is anything that I have stated that anybody believes misrepresents them in any way, if they provide me with their arguments...

then, if necessary, I will consider removing the material, and/or publish a correction, and/or apologise.

If I do not hear anything (nobody has complained to me since I set up this site in March 2010) then I can only assume the accuracy of everything on this site, and that nobody has been misrepresented in any way.

G Widders






[last update 15 Aug 2012]