hewasanutter.com

9) "the best investigative journalism in the field today"

Intro Contact / Links Blog GW comments

 

Main Menu

 
Intro) Listen to Muriel Gray lie
 
1) Muriel Gray's High Court claim 17 Dec 09 against Geoff Widders
 
2) Proof of the date of Geoff Widders novel
 
3) Muriel Gray lied to the audience
 
4) Costs and Gillian Cross

 

5) The Ancient 2000 does not exist

 

6) Deception Exposed

 

7) "A tomorrow's chip wrapper affair "

 

8) Muriel Gray "one of the most insulting things"

 

9) "best investigative journalism in the field today "

 

10) Support for a lie?

 

11) GW Book

 

12) Muriel Gray's "homage"(s)

 

13) FantasyCon 2012

 

 

LEGAL SECTION

 
Intro) Summary of LEGAL SECTION
A) Letter to Lord Woolf

 

B) "Suffer any wrong that can be done you rather than come here"

 

C) Appendix 2 : Declaratory Judgment

 

D) Appendix 3 : Law Commission

 

E) Mr Justice Roth's reply. GW comments

 

Fi) Two Complaints to Ms Judy Anckorn, "Office for Judicial Complaints" (OJC)

 

Fii) Complaint to Sir John Brigstocke, "Judicial Ombudsman"

 

Fiii) Letter to both Ms Anckorn (OJC), and Sir John Brigstocke

 

G) Complaint to the "Solicitor's Regulation Authority "

 

H) Nichola Evans of Browne Jacobson fabricated costs

 

I) Chancery Division

 

J) Report of the Lord Neuberger Committee

 

K) Letter of Intent

 

Muriel Gray

Geoff Widders

 


RSS Feeds / Share


[Valid RSS]

Subscribe in a reader

Share |

 


Read / Sample / Purchase Flight of the Shaman



Read 'Flight of the Shaman' online


Download from this site

Flight of the Shaman [pdf]

 

 

 

"So obviously he was a nutter."

 

9) "the best investigative journalism in the field today”

 

The internet magazine article [Ansible 275] states that I issued a claim against Muriel Gray;-

“...asking not for damages but for an official ruling that Muriel Gray had told a fib and should jolly well be ashamed of herself.”

I have presented detailed accounts of my claim against Ms Gray, I have detailed the events of three court hearings, nowhere have I referred to my claim in terms of a “fib” or asking the court to rule that Ms Gray “should jolly well be ashamed of herself”.

In all my correspondence and on hewasanutter.com I state clearly that Muriel Gray lied.

The author of the article is referred to as “[JS]”, the article is linked to from Jim Steel's website – the link states;-

Ansible 275

For the best investigative journalism in the field today.”

 

If this is an example of investigative journalism then I think that the author of the article, “should jolly well be ashamed of themselves.”


8 Sept 2010

Jim Steel has now added to his article Ansible 275. He describes it as an, "attempt to summarize a long story" - it was not a summary, it was a deliberate attempt to ridicule and distort the true facts.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

..

.

.

 

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

..

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

top

My undertaking

If there is anything that I have stated on this site that is not correct; if Muriel Gray, Harper Collins, Browne Jacobson, or any person(s) mentioned in these pages, contacts me and provides the evidence or counter argument to show that I am not correct, or...

if there is anything that I have stated that anybody believes misrepresents them in any way, if they provide me with their arguments...

then, if necessary, I will consider removing the material, and/or publish a correction, and/or apologise.

If I do not hear anything (nobody has complained to me since I set up this site in March 2010) then I can only assume the accuracy of everything on this site, and that nobody has been misrepresented in any way.

G Widders