Main Menu

Intro) Listen to Muriel Gray lie

1) Muriel Gray's High Court claim 17 Dec 09 against Geoff Widders

2) Proof of the date of Geoff Widders novel

3) Muriel Gray lied to the audience

4) Costs and Gillian Cross

5) The Ancient 2000 does not exist

6) Deception Exposed

7) "A tomorrow's chip wrapper affair "

8) Muriel Gray "one of the most insulting things"

9) "best investigative journalism in the field today "

10) Support for a lie?

11) GW Book

12) Muriel Gray's "homage"(s)

13) FantasyCon 2012

LEGAL SECTION

Intro) Summary of LEGAL SECTION

A) Letter to Lord Woolf

B) "Suffer any wrong that can be done you rather than come here"

C) Appendix 2 : Declaratory Judgment

D) Appendix 3 : Law Commission

E) Mr Justice Roth's reply. GW comments

Fi) Two Complaints to Ms Judy Anckorn, "Office for Judicial Complaints" (OJC)

Fii) Complaint to Sir John Brigstocke, "Judicial Ombudsman"

Fiii) Letter to both Ms Anckorn (OJC), and Sir John Brigstocke

G) Complaint to the "Solicitor's Regulation Authority "

H) Nichola Evans of Browne Jacobson fabricated costs

I) Chancery Division

J) Report of the Lord Neuberger Committee

K) Letter of Intent

RSS Feeds / Share

Subscribe in a reader

Read / Sample / Purchase Flight of the Shaman

Download from this site

Flight of the Shaman [pdf]

"So obviously he was a nutter."

 

Intro) Listen to Muriel Gray lie

Muriel Gray; Chair of the Orange Awards, writer, broadcaster, companies director, etc. told an audience that "this guy" had complained to HarperCollins that she had "stolen my story."

Muriel Gray told the audience that the guy's book was "practically the double" of hers, but that he had written his book "long after" hers. She told the audience, "So obviously he was a nutter."

Muriel Gray worked the audience up to a "big laugh."

Muriel Gray had in fact lied to the audience about the date of the guy's work.

I am the "guy."

LISTEN TO MURIEL GRAY LIE [55 secs]

 

I issued a claim against Muriel Gray in the Small Claims court [view it here]. It was a simple claim, I simply wished to prove, in a court of law, that my book was not written "long after" hers. In fact it was written long before hers. Instead of answering that simple claim Muriel Gray employed a team of top flight lawyers to prevent the claim being heard. She had to take the matter to the High Court before her team succeeded.

I had asked that the courts rule upon which book was written first. Instead of allowing my Small Claim to progress Mr Justice Roth, sitting in the Chancery Division of the High Court, stated his concerns for "public figures." What are the courts for if not to rule upon the truth?

My website now puts the matter to the public. Instead of the courts carrying out their function and determining the truth of this matter it is now for the public.

I hope you will wish to enquire further and that my website hewasanutter.com will provide you with answers.

Regards

Geoff Widders

 

SITE STATISTICS

[last update 15 Aug 2012]

 

SITE MAP HTML

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

 

 

top

My undertaking If there is anything that I have stated on this site that is not correct; if Muriel Gray, Harper Collins, Browne Jacobson, or any person(s) mentioned in these pages, contacts me and provides the evidence or counter argument to show that I am not correct, or... if there is anything that I have stated that anybody believes misrepresents them in any way, if they provide me with their arguments... then, if necessary, I will consider removing the material, and/or publish a correction, and/or apologise. If I do not hear anything (nobody has complained to me since I set up this site in March 2010) then I can only assume the accuracy of everything on this site, and that nobody has been misrepresented in any way. G Widders